Uber stated it discovered greater than 100 situations wherein passengers who claimed its drivers sexually assaulted or harassed them supplied bogus or doctored receipts to show ridership, or didn’t clarify their lack of ability to offer receipts.
In a Wednesday courtroom submitting, Uber urged US District Choose Charles Breyer in San Francisco to order 21 plaintiffs with suspect receipts to justify why their claims shouldn’t be dismissed, and 90 plaintiffs to offer receipts or “non-boilerplate” causes for his or her absence.
A minimum of 11 legislation companies symbolize the varied plaintiffs, courtroom papers present. These companies had no rapid remark or didn’t instantly reply to requests for touch upon Thursday. They weren’t accused of wrongdoing.
Uber is making an attempt to scale back its legal responsibility in nationwide federal litigation comprising greater than 2,450 lawsuits alleging driver misconduct. It faces a number of hundred extra lawsuits in San Francisco Superior Courtroom.
The San Francisco-based firm has maintained it shouldn’t be responsible for prison conduct by drivers it connects with passengers, and that its background checks and disclosures had been adequate.
On July 8, Breyer dismissed some fraud and legal responsibility claims that had been primarily based on adverts selling Uber’s ride-sharing service as a secure various to drunk driving.
In Wednesday’s submitting, Uber stated some faux receipts seem to have been generated by means of third-party web sites.
Uber stated some receipts contained math errors or bogus surcharges, modified feminine driver names to male names, had been timestamped earlier than rides occurred, had stray marks, or used formatting that doesn’t match its personal.
One plaintiff submitted two receipts for a single experience, whereas two plaintiffs submitted completely different variations of the identical receipt, the corporate stated.
“Nothing is more critical to the integrity of our judicial system than honesty,” Uber stated. “It is difficult to conceive an act of misconduct graver than the outright fabrication of evidence that plaintiffs here undertook.”
The case is In re Uber Applied sciences Inc Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation, U.S. District Courtroom, Northern District of California, No. 23-03084.
